On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Barry Leiba wrote: >>> The usual set of formats and diffs are at: >>> <http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata> >> >> I'm sending the PROTO write-up to Pasi to get processing started on >> this. Of course, serious errors can still be corrected, if necessary. >> >> Barry (as chair) > > I continue to be amazed at how utterly useless this document is, and > more so that people are being asked to break a sweat to issue it. The > most serious error is that it is a solution in search of a problem. > > Is there *one* person/organization here who can say that this text > changed or affected their implementation in any way?
Yes. It hasn't affected our current implementation, but it will help to guide me on implementation choices I make in the future. Regards, Al Iverson ExactTarget -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
