Current? No. Future? Yes.
Michael Thomas wrote: > Barry Leiba wrote: > >>> The usual set of formats and diffs are at: >>> <http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata> >>> >> I'm sending the PROTO write-up to Pasi to get processing started on >> this. Of course, serious errors can still be corrected, if necessary. >> >> Barry (as chair) >> > > I continue to be amazed at how utterly useless this document is, and > more so that people are being asked to break a sweat to issue it. The > most serious error is that it is a solution in search of a problem. > > Is there *one* person/organization here who can say that this text > changed or affected their implementation in any way? > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
