On May 8, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > If so, then it may be that we do have consensus to produce a 4871bis > that rolls up the errata and makes editorial clarifications that > garner consensus along the way but no more. > > Does that sound about right?
Yes. -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
