Eliot, Eliot Lear wrote: > Although it seems that I'm on the other side of the issue from Jim, I'm > don't think the below is quite fair. > >> And just to keep things real, can you cite some examples of the effect >> you are concerned about? > > If we accept the existing dogma that draft indicates "more stable" and > that Proposed indicates "less", then Jim shouldn't have to answer the > above question because he is operating under that dogma. That's a more > fundamental debate that should take place elsewhere (and has, to no > one's benefit).
Eliot, any of us can raise a concern. There is an infinite number of them to choose from. Many concerns that are logical and appear reasonable actually do not turn out to be hold true. Lest we constantly be chasing fears that lack substance, experience is the filter to aid distinguishing among concerns. Jim is clearly concerned about more that changing the label, even though the label is defined to mean 'more stable'. Absent details and examples to substantiate it, how are we to take his concern and apply it to anything specific? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
