> The use of the DKIM l=, z= and x= features provide a means for > recipients to separately evaluate DKIM signatures without reliance on > intermediary assessors. In addition, the A-R header does not capture > the IP address when assessing path registration protocols, which means > that safe recipient reassessment might only be possible in the case of > DKIM or reverse DNS. > [...]
Could we please not re-re-re-rehash these A-R issues on ietf-dkim? They were already covered on mail-vet-discuss more times than I can count. The archives of that list are public in case anyone really needs to go through them all again. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
