On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:37:56 +0100, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <[email protected]> wrote:
> In light of the comments by Bill Oxley and my belief that the ability of > a domain to designate signing by a specified 3rd party is useful, I'd > like to see this included in the update. I believe this would be useful > for ISPs as well as ESPs. I don't have any specific wording or proposals > on this. At item I would like to see is some clear guidance to mailing list expanders (otherwise they are all going to do it differently). It may turn out that there is no "one size fits all" solution, but I doubt that 57 different solutions would be needed either. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
