SM wrote: > At 08:54 18-10-2009, Barry Leiba wrote: > >>> * Collect data on the deployment and interoperability of the >>> Author Domain Signing Practices protocol (RFC 5617), and >>> determine if/when it's ready to advance on the standards track. >>> Update it at Proposed Standard or advance it to Draft Standard, >>> as appropriate. > > I cannot support advancing RFC 5617 to Draft Standard. The message > posted by one of the WG Chairs at > http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q4/012747.html summarizes > why I don't think that it is useful to have the discussion.
if the resolution is not possible using any update process, such as the Deployment Guide, then +1, I can not support advancing RFC 5617 to Draft Standard. -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
