Michael Deutschmann:
> If this is indeed the official semantics of the protocol, then I would
> petition to add a "dkim=except-mlist" policy. Which means "I sign
> everything that leaves my bailiwick, but may post to signature-breaking
> MLs."
Are you going to announce all your users mailing list subscriptions
in the policy record? If you do, that could be a privacy problem.
If you don't, then the spammer can add any mailing list header to
the message, and they can drive their truck through this hole.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
