Michael Deutschmann wrote: > While I don't think the Hector/Levine interpretation is very useful, I > think it would be a sound strategic move to yield to them regarding > dkim=all, and instead create our own dkim=except-mlist space where our > semantics are in place with *no ambiguity*.
Whatever the semantics that you have in mind, the underlying question is who will adopt it and what is your basis for claiming they will adopt it? The next question is whether the answers to the first question justify the considerable costs of pursuing this suggestion. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
