Hi Hector, We need to keep the tone here under control and in particular the text below is inappropriate. Please desist from making assertions like this on this list.
hector wrote: > Well, maybe if the WG can get a true champion of POLICY and not one > that selfishly took over SSP with the sole clever confessing purpose > of creating a non-working protocol poison pill, then could change. ... > Your input is extremely bias and a conflict of interest to the WG > participants who have interest in seeing a POLICY system work. And just to be clear, your blaming us as you say below, is not a problem for me. > But you know, I don't blame you. I blame the CHAIRS for allowing this > to occur. It is surreal! If you feel the need to discuss this further please do that off-list with Barry & I. Stephen. > > Is that crazy or what? > >> This tells me that I'm not the only one who >> thinks that there isn't a business case for ADSP. > > > Thats crazy! > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
