> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:53 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy; John R. Levine; Daniel Black > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the > receiving side > > > Another data point: Google Mail won't use ADSP because they will not > > discard someone's mail outright without a written agreement from the > > sending domain agreeing to same, absolving them of responsibility for > > mail that never arrives. > > You mean that they won't publish ADSP records? Or that they won't > respect > any ADSP records? Or that they won't discard "discardable" messages?
They won't honour ADSP "dkim=discardable" records posted by others. > Logically, none of these things follow. Publishing ADSP records doesn't > mean that Google will discard anything, though it does grant permission > for > others to do so. They have lots of other things that they can do as a > result of ADSP fails. Presumably, they'd be more aggressive with > quarantining mail if there's an ADSP record that renders a specific > email > discardable. Heck, they could even argue that publication of > "dkim=discardable" does absolve them. I'm only relaying what I was told at a conference. You're free to contact them for an explanation beyond what I've said. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
