Charles Lindsey wrote: > All of them are a proper subject of discussion, should this WG decide to > embark on such a BCP (and the misunderstandings repeatedly displayed here > seem to suggest that something of the sort is needed).
Agreed, except for one thing: until there's a larger set of users of ADSP, no practice can be said to be common. A "considerations for use" document might help, though I'm not sure what it could say that the RFC doesn't already cover. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
