On 10/15/2009 01:02 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: > Charles Lindsey wrote: > >> All of them are a proper subject of discussion, should this WG decide to >> embark on such a BCP (and the misunderstandings repeatedly displayed here >> seem to suggest that something of the sort is needed). > > Agreed, except for one thing: until there's a larger set of users of ADSP, > no practice can be said to be common. > > A "considerations for use" document might help, though I'm not sure what it > could say that the RFC doesn't already cover.
Better would be what not to do/expect, and I think that the RFC is sort of skimpy on that point. That said, I doubt we could ever come to consensus. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
