On 10/17/2009 08:36 PM, hector wrote: > This this mean, if I read you and thomas right, DKIM=ALL means 3rd > party signers are possible without valid 1st signatures?
Manifestly this is possible. "All" just says what the author's sender does as a matter of policy/practice. It can't build an electric fence around the message to keep people from altering though. Including destroying that signature and adding their own. It's up to the receiver to make sense of that eventuality. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
