--On 17 October 2009 17:57:30 +0000 John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>> But whatever, we may need a straw poll followed by a clarification RFC, >> to settle once and for all whether Levine or Thomas is canon. > > Mike's version is what the RFC says. My version is the way that way > too many people will misunderstand it, no matter what it actually > says. Then it needs explicit clarification in implementation guides. I think that what the RFCs say is good. It's enough to give real benefit to recipients, whereas the misinterpretation will make ADSP practically unusable (as if only "discardable" existed). > You've illustrated my point very well. Thanks! > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
