>> This is the mailing list advice that I strongly suggest we NOT attempt >> to provide at this point.
> strongly disagree. Filtering early is more likely to pickup signature > breakage and protect the down stream recipient. Its more likely to > reject back to the sender if they configured stuff wrong. > Advice could be split between forwarders that break signature and those that > done. Keep in mind the dkim goal of is message integrity not reputation > (despite its usefulness here). This is exactly the kind of speculation to which I was referring. Nobody at this point has more than the most rudimentary experience with DKIM and mailing lists, nobody has any experience with ADSP at all. I won't rehash all the reasons that the mailing list "message integrity" argument is utterly wrongheaded, but there is clearly no consensus on it. So stop it, already. Go write some software, use it, and come back and tell us about your experience with it. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
