----- "J.D. Falk" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian Eiloart wrote: > > > That seems sensible to me. So lists should not forward email that > they're > > about to render 'discardable' by breaking the signature. Instead, > they > > should reject (5xx) or bounce (DSN) the message. Presumably, a bank > wants > > to know if it has a bad email address for a customer. > > Yep. > > > Of course, if you > > aren't going to break the signature, or are rewriting the From: > address, > > then it's OK to forward the email. > > Probably. > if you are rewriting the from and put the original sender in the sender: field, most MUA will display it like this:
Sent by JD Falk on the behalf of DKIM-WG Seems strange to me. If you rewrite only the From: header then the MUA will display from: DKIM-WG then you hope there is a signature of some sort to know who sent the email originally. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
