>> 1. Advance DKIM base to Draft Standard > >I'd require Yahoo! Inc's IPR to be upgraded to the current GPL release >before that. (See https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/693/)
The reference to the GPL looks to me like it only covers the old Sourceforge DK library, which I don't think anyone uses any more. The patent, which is what's important, is covered by a separate license that Yahoo wrote. Even if Yahoo were willing, this would involve negotiations with their lawyers which always takes a long time. What would be the advantage to anyone of demanding license changes for obsolete code? Signed, Confused _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
