On 25/Jan/10 20:48, John R. Levine wrote: >> suppose that Yahoo! Inc goes out of business and the domain keys patent is >> acquired by Unisys... > > Then it makes no difference at all, since the existing license is > perpetual and sublicensable.
But that's bound by, and subject to, the Specifications unspecified by a broken link. > Really, this is not a productive line of argument. Sadly agreed. Non-productivity stems from using patent encumbered ideas and suspecting that DKIM, much like a pigeon, can be shoot down as soon as it flies. Isn't there anything that the IETF can do, in connection with rechartering, to get out of the impasse? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
