On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:07 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: > Also, FWIW: yes to meeting in Anaheim.
Stephen and I had thought there was no work to do in a face-to-face meeting at this point. The "deployment" doc is going through the IESG, gradually. We're sorting out what to do with a re-charter, but it's not clear that won't settle out on the mailing list. Do others think we should meet in Anaheim? If so, please propose an agenda. Stephen and I will be there in any case, so it's OK with us if DKIM meets. But we'd rather not do it "just because". It seems that Maastricht (IETF 78) would be better timing to have real work to do. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
