> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Delany > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:00 AM > To: Michael Thomas > Cc: IETF DKIM WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Broken signature analysis > > I wasn't thinking of wide activation necessarily, it might be > something that, eg, just MAAWG members and implementors might > selective enable over an interop testing period.
This isn't the first time I've heard DKIM interop mentioned recently, so now I'm curious: Are we interested in repeating the work done in Dallas? If so, what are we hoping to learn from a second round? Apart from ADSP, I don't think DKIM has changed enough to make that effort interesting right now. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
