>>> Doesn't that conflict with the practice of removing A-Rs? >> >> You only need to remove A-Rs that claim to be from you. > >That's a claim worth challenging.
Well, that's what section 5 of RFC 5451 says. If you think it's wrong, why didn't you say so back when there was time to change it? R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
