On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:57:57 -0000, <[email protected]> wrote: > Forensics and reporting is about all one can do with a broken signature
It's up to recipients. I they really care about whether some mesage was genuine, they might find it worthwhile to try to deduce from the diagnostic headers what had got lost/added, and then try to reverify a corrected version. A lot of work, but useful in some cases, and always useful to identify sites that had caused the problem and for issuing LARTs accordingly. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
