Barry Leiba wrote: >> is "no" because IDNs themselves don't really work today, as a practical >> matter, in the context of email. What is clear is that folks from DKIM >> need to track and perhaps influence EAI. >> > > Does this, then, turn into another item on the new charter? > "Work with the EAI working group to ensure that DKIM and EAI work well > together." ? > Howse about something more reactionary: things that mangle bytes after they leave a signer are an automatic DISCUSS with extreme prejudice from the security AD's.
Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
