> This looks good, although the schedule seems very aggressive. I think it > would be very helpful to know that there are volunteers for each component, > so that they can get a running start. Are there?
I agree; I'd be happier with the dates more spread out, but 1. I'm documenting what's been said here, with just some minimal adjustments, and 2. for the interop report, I'm responding to the urgency that some have expressed. So, as Eliot asks: Do we really have people with time and inclination to push these through? Are these dates reasonable, or should some be pushed out a bit? In any case, who will work on which items? Please post here, if you will actively work on the milestones (and specify which). And, in particular, if you want to be the primary pen on the interop report, send an off-list note to the chairs, <[email protected]>. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
