On 03/11/2010 10:50 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Just two unprocessed errata left! Tackling the easier one first: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1532 > > Appendix A of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment has detailed text about > this topic (differences in DNS key records between DomainKeys and DKIM), > so I'm not sure if RFC 4871 really needs this information. > > How about rejecting this errata (with a pointer to Appendix A > of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment in the Notes field)?
Works for me. Absent objections in the next week, let's go for that. Stephen. > > Best regards, > Pasi > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
