On Apr 27, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 4/27/2010 10:40 AM, McDowell, Brett wrote: >> That's how I see it. The key is that Y *validates* the DKIM signature and >> processes the sender's ADSP > > > Where is this going to be supported? That is, how widespread does anyone > believe that support for this scenario will be? Why?
I'm not sure if you were asking this as a rhetorical question in an attempt to imply that such adoption would be low, or if you actually expected some of us who may have non-public knowledge of such plans to disclose them to this public mail list, or if you were soliciting speculation. In any event, I can only speculate. But since both Yahoo! and Google already validate DKIM and (with certain senders anyway) enforce "discardable", it's no great stretch of the imagination that they might support something like what we've articulated above for their Google Groups/Yahoo! Groups services. Why might they do it? For all the same reasons they do DKIM blocking today... whatever those reasons may be. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
