On 28/Apr/10 17:23, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 4/28/2010 8:02 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: >> 1) [...] policy against posting to lists using the domain in question. >> >> 2) One possible recommendation to list managers is that if a message to >> the list is DKIM signed AND has an ADSP discardable policy AND the >> signature cannot be maintained intact then the list should bounce the >> message. > > What is the particular benefit of doing this, rather than letting the > receiving > site do the bouncing?
Force posters to obey #1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
