On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you are raising the (much) larger question of constraining the nature > of > changes made by MLMs. Since they [sic] are actually posting an entirely new > message,
and forging the From address > they have the legitimate freedom to do what they want to it. is it really legitimate in today's world? > However, some can > choose to participate in that much more constrained role, looking more like a > relaying MTA than a modifying intermediary. DKIM should be able to survive that. ps - yes, I know this hash been hashed out many times before. Eventually we'll all be dust and something else will prevail. :) -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
