>> or this might be a narrow scenario where ADSP could do less harm >> than good. > > could you elaborate. I'm rusty on ADSP. Was a MLM option introduced?
No, ADSP can say "throw away mail that purports to be from me if it's not signed", and the MLM could apply it to incoming mail. > Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive > policies to fail. Seems like ADSP would make things worse in this > case. Indeed. I'm assuming that any list that paid attention to ADSP would sign its outgoing mail and would expect its recipients to trust it enough to whitelist the list's mail. Or equally (more?) likely, ADSP doesn't really work, and users who sign everything can tell the list manually. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
