On 4/29/10 11:12 AM, "Michael Thomas" <[email protected]> scribbled:
> With respect to DKIM, anybody who filters based on broken signatures without > any (or little) other input pretty much deserves the false positive rate > they're complaining about. Ok. I think we (PayPal) are on the same page. We recognized that DomainKeys with "o=-" and DKIM without "t=y" and ADSP with "dkim=discardable" is likely to have some collateral damage. We work to minimize it but believe the value in preventing phish is worth that cost. Not like email has ever been guaranteed delivery. ;) -Jot -- Jot Powers [email protected] _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
