>For non-obvious reasons it would be easier to do it the other way. >Make corp come from a subdomain and change the policy there and >keep transactional as paypal.com.
Sure, so long as the domains are different, although I would suggest that for branding reasons it probably would not be a good idea to tell people that unsigned mail from subdomains of paypal.com is OK. Use x.com or one of the hundred of other domains paypal has. I just don't see how you can simultaneously say "throw away unsigned mail" and "don't throw away unsigned mail if a list says it used to be signed" unless you have some way to identify trustworthy lists. But once you know that a list is trustworthy, why wouldn't you just accept all its mail? I just don't see a plausible scenario where you you know you trust the list but still want to accept or reject mail based on assertions the list itself makes. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
