In article <[email protected]> you write: >On 29/Apr/10 01:12, SM wrote: >> The diversity >> of the email environment is such that you cannot come up with a >> "mellowed" canonicalization to cope with every possible change. > >Yet, it would seem that by, say, hashing just invariants of binary >representations of the first entity, e.g. discarding its white space >and punctuation, one may reach very high percentages of unbroken >retransmission.
It sounds like you want to experiment with different canon schemes for DKIM, rather than the two that exist now. Wouldn't that be more appropriate for ASRG? R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
