On 17/May/10 11:47, Serge Aumont wrote: > "ADSP = discardable" means : "the domain encourages the recipient(s) to > discard it.". So a pretty MLM should discard thoses messages unless it > is able to brodcast it to subscribers without DKIM signature alteration. > "ADSP = all" does not recommend to drop thoses messages. > > If think it would be an error to recommend that MLM handles "ADSP = > all" in the same way as they handle email with "discardable" domain. If > so "ADSP = all" will have a very poor difference with "ADSP = > discardable" a very very low number of domaines will use such ADSP policy.
+1 > The "l=" seems to be ignored by every DKIM users. It's interest is > really limited. My opinion is that we should not recommend its usage > because it is not MIME compatible. MIME is an very old standard > implemented by almost every mail products. "l=" tag is an hack in DKIM > introduced only for dirty MLM software that still ignore MIME and will > probably ignore DKIM for a long time ;-). It should be forgotten ! I see my messages get a dkim=pass for my signature when they come back from the (few) mailing lists I'm subscribed to that don't remove signatures, because of the "l=". That is to say, IME it works as advertised. As for signing MIME messages, I agree DKIM is broken, because it is legal to alter even the MIME preamble. The discussion on a MIME-compatible canonicalization algorithm has been moved to ASRG, and I look forward to going about it in the near future. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
