That doesn't seem to be about mailing lists. I don't see that we're re-opening ADSP now and we're not chartered for that, so I don't really see much point in this discussion.
So perhaps take that discussion offlist? Stephen. On 05/19/2010 01:18 AM, Michael Deutschmann wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010, Douglas Otis wrote: >> Why would you see "rejectable" as being different from "all" assertions? > > Just about everyone thinks EITHER that "rejectable" would be redundant > with "all", OR ... _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
