--On 24 May 2010 09:08:42 -0400 "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I guess the list should be rejecting his email! Then, perhaps, his >> organisation would get around to deploying a non-discardable domain. > > I've suggested it. They know they have a problem, but they won't yet say > what they're going to do about it. > > As you may recall, they suggested that lists sign an A-R header and all > recipient systems track what lists they're subscribed to and do > complicated processing to see whether list mail was signed when it showed > up at the list. Oddly, that didn't get much traction. > > R's, > John I do recall. Perhaps if the list (and other lists) were rejecting the mail, they'd be more likely to act. We don't have to wait for them, do we? -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
