--On 24 May 2010 14:33:13 -0700 Steve Atkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On May 24, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- >>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins >>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:42 PM >>> To: DKIM List >>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available >>> >>>>> Not at all. If we can agree that lists should reject discardable >>> mail >>>>> out of self defense, that's a good point to add to the BCP. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Refusing signups from those domains is probably a bit extreme, though. >> >> What about a warning at signup time if a "discardable" ADSP record is >> found for the registrant's domain? > > Seems like a reasonable UX design to me but probably > more a choice for the developer than a BCP, I think. > > (I think that refusing signups from ADSP using domains > may also be a reasonable choice for the developer or list > admin in some cases. But not something to put in a BCP.) Why not? At least mention that it might be polite to make such a warning. After all, the person signing up might have no clue at all that their domain is 'discardable'. I guess we can't claim that it's common practice, never might best common practice. But it is, surely, a good idea. > Cheers, > Steve > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
