On May 27, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Michael Thomas wrote: > The problem with the cross examination that John and Steve are trying > to perform is that the witnesses are under no obligation to respond. And, > quite reasonably, they don't.
I appreciate the support, but I didn't want to leave anyone with the false impression that I had abandoned the debate just because I hadn't responded to the list in the past 22 hours or so. Although I do consider some of the counter-arguments as FUD and/or deliberately obtuse, I've actually tried to be responsive to all questions and comments on the list since joining. For better or worse I'm in for penny, in for a pound. I've been in standards development for awhile... I'm not that easily discouraged ;-) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
