On 5/28/10 2:24 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote: > Dave CROCKER wrote: > >> On 5/28/2010 12:07 PM, Jeff Macdonald wrote: >> >>> But I'd like to see if I understand the difference your are trying to >>> highlight between a manually maintained list and a self published >>> list. >>> >> There is a key semantic difference which, I believe, makes for a key >> difference >> in utility. >> >> In a manually maintained list, there is an independent assessment of what >> domain >> names are worth worrying about. (The independence is from the owner of the >> domain. The assessment might be by a third part or it might be by the >> recipient.) >> > Before going forward talking about 'manually maintained lists' can > someone define what that is? What exactly are we talking about, how does > it operate, by whom, involved parties etc.? > Dave has well defined the difference between ADSP assertions and manually created lists of authentication acceptance criteria. In the latter case, a domain is unable to react. For manually generated lists, these represent a reaction to domains being flooded with phishing attempts. As with the course of rivers changing over time, this often happens by getting wider. If ADSP were easier to use without being disruptive, restrictive ADSP assertions would be more common.
-Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
