Scott Kitterman wrote: > "Dave CROCKER" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 6/2/2010 8:08 AM, Al Iverson wrote: >> >>> Agree. "Discard" and "silently discard" mean the same thing, in my >>> opinion. Though, I am guilty of using the phrase "silently discard." >>> Maybe in an attempt to be slightly over-specific. >>> >> I do not recall seeing a dictionary or technical definition of "discard" >> that >> says anything at all about whether the discarder says anything at all. >> >> Taken on its own and without further technical specifications 'discard' does >> not >> direct, imply or request that the action be silent or noisy, and if noisy >> who >> gets to hear it. >> > > IIRC, this is by design since there was no consensus around what exactly to > do. Personally, I tend to favor not having messages silently vanish. >
+1 As stated before, I have not followed the entire discussion on ADSP in depth, so please bear with me. I could not find relevant items in the archives, but has there ever been suggested to have a 'rejectable' in addition to 'discardable' and 'all'? /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
