Douglas Otis wrote: > IIRC, Sendmail defined DISCARD in their Access Database Format, where to > override rejection, assert OK; to permit relaying, assert RELAY; to > always reject the message, assert REJECT; and to discard the message > completely, assert DISCARD.
And the Postfix man page for accesss defines DISCARD as: Claim successful delivery and silently discard the message. Log the optional text if specified, otherwise log a generic message. But the fact that Sendmail or Postfix define it this way does not necessarily mean that "discard"/"discardable" has the same meaning in the context of ADSP. If "discardable" needs further definition, it has to be defined in the context of ADSP in the next revision of the ADSP document. > Unfortunately, ADSP did not define what > was meant by "discardable". This draft could add clarity with a section > that defines its meaning. > No, not in this BCP draft. It has to be defined in the next revision of the ADSP document. /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
