On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 6/2/2010 2:58 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> If we all agree that that's a valid characterization of ADSP, I suggest we >> move to get it downgraded from Proposed Standard to Experimental. > > I don't recall seeing anything that looks like "we all agree" on such a > point. > That some do is fine,but we also know that many do not.
Count me as not agreeing. We always knew ADSP discardable wasn't appropriate for domains with users who send messages to mailing lists, and is equally inappropriate for all sorts of other legitimate uses of email. It's possible that the draft doesn't contain a strong enough warning that discardable = mail could be discarded, but that doesn't mean the whole thing is entirely broken. I'd really like to hear from a domain owner who published a discardable policy even though they knew they had users who send messages to mailing lists. I'd like to know why they thought it was okay. Then, we'll know. -- J.D. Falk <[email protected]> Return Path Inc _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
