So it seems reasonable for folks to discuss this for a few days
and if a consensus is clear we can go from there. Otherwise maybe
we can poll about in next week or so. (Other suggestions welcome,
particularly from Murray as editor.)

S.

On 10/08/10 15:06, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/9/2010 11:53 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Since Dave suggests a fissioning of this document into two or more, I'll hold
>> off applying his until after that's done and some discussion about it has
>> been had.
> 
> 
> I'm a fan of getting the mix and balance of documents right.  Extra documents 
> are a hassle, but a single document that mixes agendas is too.  I was a bit 
> surprised to make the suggestion that this doc get split.
> 
> 1.  Are there different topics?  If so, what are they and which should be 
> pursued?  The working groups needs to comment on this.
> 
>      I think I saw 3 different topics, and that there has already been a bit 
> of 
> discussion about this.  The topics are:
> 
>      a.  Handling DKIM messages transiting a Mailing List Manager
> 
>      b.  Trust-based enhancements for Mailing List Managers based on DKIM
> 
>      c.  Best practices for Mailing List Managers
> 
> The first is/was the official goal of the current work.
> 
> The latter two have emerged.  Neither is formally within scope of the working 
> group, although b. is a natural addition.  Note, however, that it is formal 
> protocol specification work and we need to worry about adoption first -- who 
> needs to adopt it and why do we think they will?
> 
> c. is not reasonably in scope; I do not see any way to justify it within this 
> working group, in spite of there having been some good discussion.
> 
> 
> 2.  If a split is appropriate, how should the existing content be divided?
> 
>      I vote for letting Murray handle this.  (You're welcome, Murray.)
> 
> So, the first question is intended to get some working group consensus, 
> before 
> Murray puts in the effort of dividing things up.
> 
> d/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to