On 8/24/10 8:17 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: > On Aug 24, 2010, at 6:35 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >>> may I suggest we stop here for a moment and get back to the original >>> question, which in essence was: should a 1st signer DKIM signature be >>> preserved 'coûte que coûte' when a message is handled by a MLM, or not. > It shouldn't, at least not if it means the MLM has to modify it's behaviour > significantly. Subject line tags, unsubscription footers, that sort of thing > are all useful features that shouldn't be sacrificed at the altar of > theoretical ADSP corner cases. Agreed. >> The answer is yes, sure, but that's the same answer I'd offer if you asked >> if spammers should set the evil bit (RFC 3514) when sending their mail. >> >> As others have noted, list software does what it does, list managers do what >> they do, and the chances that they will do anything we ask drop radically as >> we make more demands on them. >> >> I think it's reasonable to encourage them to put a list signature on >> outgoing mail. It'll probably help them get the list mail delivered, > It won't hurt. Agreed.
-Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
