On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:07 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rolf E. Sonneveld [mailto:[email protected]] [ . . . ] >> We should not change the >> essentials of DKIM for sake of MLM transparancy; the best we can do is >> document the status quo of the combination of DKIM and MLMs, its >> problems and (within the boundaries of the DKIM spec) any hints that can >> solve or mitigate those problems. > > I absolutely agree with your last statement.
+1 So what we SHOULD be arguing about (those of us interested in forward progress) is whether draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 meets the documentation goal Rolf described above. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
