On 8/30/2010 11:03 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I’d like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem to > have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in other > documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to proceed. > > So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following: > > (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses > signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items > addressed, > a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add enhancements to > MLMs > in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing lists irrespective of DKIM > (Dave’s proposal);
+1 I'd suggest that the second item actually be a normative specification of value-added features. This requires a change to the charter, and so it would have to wait until completing the current charter. > If you advocate for a general MLM BCP, this will be a non-WG document (it’s > outside of our charter) so I’d love to get some MLM operators and developers > involved. (Maybe this should take place on ietf-822 or maybe on a new non-WG > list; suggestions welcome.) Expressions of interest in that work would be > appreciated. I’ll approach the APPS ADs about a venue. +1 d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
