Dave, On 08/30/2010 08:40 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > On 8/30/2010 11:03 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> I’d like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem >> to >> have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in other >> documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to proceed. >> >> So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following: >> >> (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses >> signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items >> addressed, >> a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add enhancements to >> MLMs >> in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing lists irrespective of DKIM >> (Dave’s proposal); > +1 > > I'd suggest that the second item actually be a normative specification of > value-added features. This requires a change to the charter, and so it would > have to wait until completing the current charter.
can you elaborate on what, in your view, would be part of this normative specification? /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
