On 9/2/10 4:26 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: > Some of us have a pretty good idea. The people who design reputation systems > don't do so in a vacuum; they're constantly reacting to spammers' latest > tricks. If massive unauthorized replaying of unmodified DKIM-signed messages > ever becomes a real issue, they'll adjust accordingly. Were DKIM domains to become a primary basis for message acceptance, then replayed messages will become a real issue. The question is "Then what strategy is needed next without expecting the world to change how applications handle email." One answer might be TPA-Labels applied at the transport level during message exchange. :^)
-Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
