> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:06 AM > To: MH Michael Hammer (5304); John R. Levine; Charles Lindsey > Cc: DKIM > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review > > > > --On 13 September 2010 10:19:05 -0400 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree that if a signing domain publishes discardable then the MLM > > should discard it. > > If the message is unsigned, right? Otherwise, it should reject it at SMTP > time (actually, that might be done by the MTA rather than the MLM). In > fact > the MTA should reject (at SMTP time) > rather than discard such messages, I think. >
I have mixed feelings on this. By suggesting reject over discard I think we possibly open the door up again to Joe jobs. > Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
