MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: >> Levine wrote: >> Right. The easiest way to do so, assuming you believe that enough > people >> will use ADSP to matter, is to discard incoming messages with ADSP >> settings that can cause trouble. If they say their mail is > discardable, >> take them at their word and discard it. >> > > I agree that if a signing domain publishes discardable then the MLM > should discard it. Let's apply a little logic here. The types of > mailstreams that have been identified as being suitable candidates for > ADSP discardable have always been ones that would not be appropriate > (bank notifications, etc) for passing through MLMs in the first place. > While an ecard might be sent to all the members of a list, this is > enough of a corner case that if the domain publishes discardable then > that message should be discarded even though it would otherwise be > legitimate.
Too logical Michael. :) Some would rather not support ADSP yet acknowledge it by changing the 5322.From (a more drastic earth changing behavior) as a solution to THEIR ADSP problem. HA! Suddenly I got an urge for roasted peanuts. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
